Processing math: 0%

miercuri, 27 septembrie 2023

An Elementary Demonstration of FERMAT's Great Theorem

 

               "GREAT" or "LATEST"?  This is the question to which you can see an answer in the book 

EDWARDS H. M. - FERMAT’s LAST THEOREM : A Genetic Introduction in Algebraic Number Theory, 

.


                The Romanian mathematician Vasile Lucilius published a book that cannot be found anywhere:

"EIGHT MAJOR THEORETICAL BREAKTHROUGHS IN THE SUPERIOR MATHEMATICS"

STEF Publishing House, Iași, 2007.

 On two pages (Chapter 6) the author demonstrates, with elementary means, that the equation

x^p+y^p=z^p \;,p\geqslant 5\;prime\;number

 does not admit solutions in whole numbers.

vineri, 22 septembrie 2023

joi, 21 septembrie 2023

Tungkol sa pagkakapantay-pantay \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{6}=1 // About this beautiful identity

 (Filipineza)

          The following Problem was published on Facebook_page Canadian Mathematical Society / Société mathématique du Canada : (in bilingual presentation, as usual)


A beautiful (but somewhat unfinished) solution was presented by Regragui El Khammal (الركراكي الخمال).

          My solution is the following.


ANSWER CiP

For all positive integers satisfying inequality

\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}\;<\; 1 \tag{I}

the inequality in the statement 

\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}\;\leqslant\;\frac{41}{42} \tag{ S}

 actually occurs. The sign "=" is obtained only for

 values 2,\; 3,\; 7\; for a,\; b,\; c\; (in any order).


SOLUTION CiP

                       Let us first look for the triplets (a,b,c)\in \mathbb{Z_+}\times \mathbb{Z_+}\times \mathbb{Z_+}

 satisfying the inequality (I) and additionally verifying the condition

1\leqslant a \leqslant b \leqslant c \tag{C}\;.

Then the other triplets satisfying the inequality (I) are obtained by doing all permutations of those found.

               Let us then note the equality

\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{6}=1\;. \tag{E}               

          We will study three cases : I-III.

          I. If a\geqslant 2 and b\geqslant 3 then inequality (I) is satisfied for "sufficiently large" c.(Anyway c \geqslant 7, taking into account the equality (E); precisely c \geqslant \left [\frac{1}{1-\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}}\right]+1,[.] being the floor function , but this precision is not necessary in solving.) In this case we have

\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c} \leqslant \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{7}=\frac{41}{42}.

We have concluded (S). Equality is reached only for a=2,\;b=3,\;c=7\;, otherwise the above inequality is strict.

          II. The values a=2\; and b=2\; contradict inequality (I), so this case is not possible.

          III. Neither can a=1\; because of the same inequality (I).


      Example: for a=b=3 we have \frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{c} and this last expression is <1 for c\geqslant 4. But then

\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}\leqslant \frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{4}=\frac{11}{12}=\frac{77}{84}=\frac{82}{82}=\frac{41}{42}\;;

we get a strict inequality.

\blacksquare