Processing math: 100%

sâmbătă, 26 decembrie 2020

A PROBLEM WITH A SQUARE

          Seeing the post on facebook

https://www.facebook.com/angel.silvapalacios.1/posts/509305606696302

 

I will write a solution using complex numbers.

     At each point P of the plan corresponds a complex number z_{P}. In our figure we choose the origin so that z_{M}=0, and the real axis BC and let z_{A}=\alpha. Since the point M is the middle

 of the segment [BC] we can assign z_{B}=-\beta, z_{C}=\beta. In the given figure we have \beta =m. Each vector \overrightarrow{PQ} corresponds to the complex number z_{Q}-z_{P}. This correspondence between vectors and complex numbers is a linear application. I will also use the fact that, if the vector \overrightarrow{PQ} rotate anticlockwise around the point P by \theta degrees, obtaining the result \overrightarrow{PR}, then

z_{R}-z_{P}=(z_{Q}-z_{P}) \cdot (\cos \theta + \imath \sin \theta), or =(z_{Q}-z_{P})\cdot \exp(\imath \theta).

          Because \overrightarrow{AL}=2\cdot \overrightarrow{LB}, according to a well-known formula we have

\overrightarrow{ML}=\frac{\overrightarrow{MA}+2\cdot \overrightarrow{MB}}{1+2}.

 (It is obtained from \overrightarrow{AL}=2\cdot \overrightarrow{LB} \Leftrightarrow \overrightarrow{ML}- \overrightarrow{MA}=2(\overrightarrow{MB}- \overrightarrow{ML}) \Leftrightarrow (1+2) \overrightarrow{ML}=\overrightarrow{MA}+2\overrightarrow{MB}, etc.). So to the vector \overrightarrow{ML} corresponds the complex number \frac{\alpha -2 \beta}{3}. Ad-hoc we note this by

\overrightarrow{ML}   \mapsto   \frac{\alpha-2\beta}{3}.

 In the same way, from \overrightarrow{AN}=3\cdot \overrightarrow{NC} we deduce

\overrightarrow{MN}=\frac{\overrightarrow{MA}+3\cdot \overrightarrow{MC}}{1+3}

 so

\overrightarrow{MN}  \mapsto  \frac{\alpha +3 \beta}{4}.

 But we have that \overrightarrow{ML} is obtained from \overrightarrow{ML} by a 90^{\circ} anticlockwise rotation around the point M, so

\frac{\alpha +3\beta}{4}\cdot (\cos 90^{\circ}+\imath \sin 90^{\circ})=\frac{\alpha-2\beta}{3}

\Leftrightarrow   \frac{\alpha+3\beta}{4}\cdot \imath=\frac{\alpha-2\beta}{3}

\Leftrightarrow   3\alpha \imath +9\beta \imath=4\alpha-8\beta.

 We deduce (4-3\imath)\cdot\alpha=(8+9\imath)\cdot\beta, \alpha=\frac{8+9\imath)\cdot \beta}{4-3\imath}=\beta\cdot \frac{(8+9\imath)(4+3\imath)}{16+9}, so

(1)          \alpha=\frac{1+12\imath}{5}\cdot \beta,    \beta=\frac{1-12\imath}{29}\cdot\alpha.

      Using (1) for the vectors below we calculate the corresponding complex numbers

\overrightarrow{AB}   \mapsto   -\beta-\alpha=-6\beta \frac{1+2\imath}{5},

\overrightarrow{AC}   \mapsto   \beta-\alpha=4\beta\frac{1-3\imath}{5}.

     By rotating the vector \overrightarrow{AB} with the angle \theta, counterclockwise around point A is obtained a vector  to which corresponds the complex number z

(2)             -6\beta\cdot \frac{1+2\imath}{5}\cdot(\cos \theta +\imath \sin \theta).

 At the same time, the result of this operation is a vector collinear  with \overrightarrow{AC},
so it is represented in form \lambda \cdot \overrightarrow{AC} (with \lambda -positive real number) and to which corresponds the complex number 

(3)                      \lambda \cdot  4\beta \cdot \frac{1-3\imath}{5}.

 If we equal the two numbers in (2), (3)

-6\beta \cdot \frac{1+2\imath}{5}(\cos \theta +\imath \sin \theta)=\lambda \cdot 4\beta\cdot \frac{1-3\imath}{5}

 \Rightarrow  \cos \theta +\imath \sin \theta=-\lambda \frac{2}{3}\cdot \frac{1-3\imath}{1+2\imath}=-\lambda \cdot \frac{2}{3}\cdot \frac{(1-3\imath)(1-2\imath)}{1+4}=-\lambda\cdot \frac{2}{3}\cdot \frac{-5-5\imath}{5}, so

(4)                   \cos \theta+\imath \sin \theta=\lambda \cdot \frac{2}{3}(1+\imath).


The number to the left of the equation (4) has module 1 so it has to be \left | \lambda \cdot \frac{2}{3}(1+\imath)\right |=1 and we obtain \lambda =\frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}}. Then the formula (4) is written

\cos \theta +\imath \sin \theta=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(1+\imath)

 \Leftrightarrow     \cos \theta +\imath \sin \theta =\cos 45^{\circ}+\imath \sin 45^{\circ}

whence it results \theta=45^{\circ}.

\blacksquare


 

          REMARKS

      1)  At points L,\;N,\;K correspond the complex numbers

z_{L}=\frac{-3+4\imath}{5}\betaz_{N}=\frac{4+3\imath}{5}\beta,   z_{K}=\frac{1+7\imath}{5}\beta

(the latter is obtained by rotating the vector \overrightarrow{NM} by 90^{\circ}, clockwise, arround point N; we obtain for \overrightarrow{NK}=-\frac{4+3\imath}{5}\beta \cdot (-\imath) and z_{K}=z_{N}+\frac{-3+4\imath}{5}).

A graphical representation using GeoGebra can be seen in the following figure (I chose \beta=5). Note that point K is vertically from A to BC.


  

     2) If we do not specify the origin or the real axis then

z_{A}=\alpha, z_{B}=\beta, z_{C}=\gamma

 and the calculations would have given z_{M}=\frac{\beta+\gamma}{2}

\overrightarrow{ML}     \mapsto     \frac{(\alpha-\frac{\beta+\gamma}{2})+2\cdot(\beta-\frac{\beta+\gamma}{2})}{1+2}=\frac{2\alpha+\beta-3\gamma}{6}

\overrightarrow{MN}     \mapsto     \frac{\alpha-\frac{\beta+\gamma}{2}+3\cdot (\gamma-\frac{\beta+\gamma}{2})}{1+3}=\frac{\alpha-2\beta+\gamma}{4}.

Because the vector \overrightarrow{ML} is obtained by rotating counterclockwise, around the point M of the vector \overrightarrow{MN} by 90^{\circ}, we have

\overrightarrow{ML}  \mapsto  \imath \cdot \frac{\alpha-2\beta+\gamma}{4}

and from here

\frac{2\alpha+\beta-3\gamma}{6}=\frac{\alpha\imath-2\beta\imath+\gamma\imath}{4} 

\Leftrightarrow  \alpha \cdot (4-3\imath)=(-2-6\imath)\beta+(6+3\imath)\gamma

\Leftrightarrow  \alpha=\frac{2-6\imath}{5}\cdot\beta+\frac{3+6\imath}{5}\cdot\gamma.

Also, because rotating the vector \overrightarrow{AB} with the \theta angle we have a collinear vector with \overrightarrow{AL}, we have the equation

(\beta-\alpha)\cdot (\cos \theta+\imath \sin \theta)=\lambda \cdot (\gamma-\alpha)  (\lambda>0)

so 

\cos \theta+\imath \sin=\lambda \cdot \frac{\gamma-\alpha}{\beta-\alpha}=\lambda \cdot \frac{\frac{2-6\imath}{5}\cdot (\gamma-\beta)}{\frac{3+6\imath}{5}\cdot(\beta-\gamma)}=\lambda \cdot(-\frac{2-6\imath}{3+6\imath})=\frac{30(1+\imath}{45}\cdot \lambda=\frac{2\lambda}{3}(1+\imath)

and we find equation (4), etc.


4 comentarii:

  1. Very illustrative. Thank you for teaching us how to apply complex numbers to Euclidean geometry problems.

    RăspundețiȘtergere
  2. We have shown the solution in more detail, for those who are not experts in the field.

    RăspundețiȘtergere