It is page 9 of the "SUPLIMENTUL cu EXERCIȚII al GMB N0 12/2023".
In translation
"S:L23.322. Show that if \;a,\;b,\;c\in (0,\;\infty) and a+b+c=1, then
\frac{a+1}{\sqrt{a+bc}}\geqslant 2."
Solution CiP
We have the known inequality
\frac{x+y}{\sqrt{xy}}\geqslant 2 \tag{1}
where x,\;y are positive real numbers. The sign "=" occurs in (1) if and only if x=y.
(The deduction of (1) is immediate from the equivalents
(\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{y})^2 \geqslant 0\;\Leftrightarrow\;x-2\sqrt{x}\cdot \sqrt{y}+y \geqslant 0\;\Leftrightarrow\;x+y\geqslant 2\sqrt{xy}\;\Leftrightarrow\;(1)\;)
Back to the problem, it results from the given conditions that \;a,b,c<1 (because, for example a=1-b-c<1-0-0 and -b,-c<0).
Then the numbers x=1-b and y=1-c are positive. But we have
a+1=1-b-c+1=(1-b)+(1-c)=x+y
and
a+bc=1-b-c+bc=(1-b)(1-c)=xy
and then the inequality (1) expresses exactly what the statement requires.
\blacksquare
Remark CiP The statement does not ask when the "=" sign occurs. We will answer, as a bonus.
The sign "=" occurs if and only if (a,b,c)=(1-2t,t,t) with t\in (0, \frac{1}{2}).
Even the values t=0 (when a=1,\;b=c=0) and t=\frac{1}{2} (when a=0,\;b=c=\frac{1}{2}) are admissible for the statement.
<end Rem>
..................................................................................................................................
As Mr. Konstantine ZELATOR used to us, a problem never appears alone. I am referring to his posts related to problems in the Crux Mathematicorum magazine (although he also has concerns about UFO-logy). As I announced in the title, we will also try to solve the other problems on the photographed page.
" S:L23.321. Let ABCD be the convex quadrilateral whose diagonals
intersect at O. If \overrightarrow{AB}+\overrightarrow{AD}+\overrightarrow{AO}=\overrightarrow{BC}+\overrightarrow{DC}+\overrightarrow{OC}, show that ABCD
is a parallelogram."
Solution CiP
It seems that no figure would be needed.
I did one, with a trembling hand.The relationship given between the six vectors is written, replacing some of them with the sum of two others, in the form
(\overrightarrow{AO}+\overrightarrow{OB})+(\overrightarrow{AO}+\overrightarrow{OD})+\overrightarrow{AO}=(\overrightarrow{BO}+\overrightarrow{OC})+(\overrightarrow{DO}+\overrightarrow{OC})+\overrightarrow{OC}\;\Leftrightarrow
\Leftrightarrow\;3\overrightarrow{AO}+\overrightarrow{OB}+\overrightarrow{OD}=\overrightarrow{BO}+3\overrightarrow{OC}+\overrightarrow{DO}\;\Leftrightarrow
\Leftrightarrow \;3(\overrightarrow{AO}-\overrightarrow{OC})=2\overrightarrow{BO}+2\overrightarrow{DO}\;\Leftrightarrow\;
\Leftrightarrow\;3(\overrightarrow{AO}+\overrightarrow{CO})=2(\overrightarrow{BO}+\overrightarrow{DO}).\;\tag{1}
On the left side of the relation (1) we have a sum of two vectors collinear with \overrightarrow{AC}, so the result will also be a vector collinear with \overrightarrow{AC}. On the right side of the relation (1) we have a sum of two vectors collinear with \overrightarrow{BD}, so the result will also be a vector collinear with \overrightarrow{BD}. Thus, equality (1) is possible only if
\overrightarrow{AO}+\overrightarrow{CO}=\overrightarrow{0}=\overrightarrow{BO}+\overrightarrow{DO}\;\Leftrightarrow
\Leftrightarrow\;\overrightarrow{AO}=-\overrightarrow{CO}=\overrightarrow{OC} and \overrightarrow{BO}=-\overrightarrow{DO}=\overrightarrow{OD}. But this means that point O is both the midpoint of segment [AC] and the midpoint of [BD], thus ABCD is a parallelogram.
\blacksquare
Here is another post by Konstantine ZELATOR
RăspundețiȘtergerehttps://www.academia.edu/114466843/A_number_theory_problem_Problem_4904_January_2024_issue_of_Crux_Mathematicorum_Find_all_pairs_of_prime_numbers_x_and_y_such_that_x_or_y_x_y_is_prime_and_x_x_y_y_is_divisible_by_x_y_?email_work_card=view-paper