Faceti click pe imagine pentru descarcare.
vineri, 20 octombrie 2023
miercuri, 27 septembrie 2023
An Elementary Demonstration of FERMAT's Great Theorem
"GREAT" or "LATEST"? This is the question to which you can see an answer in the book
EDWARDS H. M. - FERMAT’s LAST THEOREM : A Genetic Introduction in Algebraic Number Theory,
.
The Romanian mathematician Vasile Lucilius published a book that cannot be found anywhere:
"EIGHT MAJOR THEORETICAL BREAKTHROUGHS IN THE SUPERIOR MATHEMATICS"
STEF Publishing House, Iași, 2007.
On two pages (Chapter 6) the author demonstrates, with elementary means, that the equation
$$x^p+y^p=z^p \;,p\geqslant 5\;prime\;number$$
does not admit solutions in whole numbers.
sâmbătă, 23 septembrie 2023
vineri, 22 septembrie 2023
joi, 21 septembrie 2023
Tungkol sa pagkakapantay-pantay $\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{6}=1$ // About this beautiful identity
(Filipineza)
The following Problem was published on Facebook_page Canadian Mathematical Society / Société mathématique du Canada : (in bilingual presentation, as usual)
A beautiful (but somewhat unfinished) solution was presented by Regragui El Khammal (الركراكي الخمال).
My solution is the following.
ANSWER CiP
For all positive integers satisfying inequality
$$\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}\;<\; 1 \tag{I}$$
the inequality in the statement
$$\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}\;\leqslant\;\frac{41}{42} \tag{ S}$$
actually occurs. The sign "$=$" is obtained only for
values $2,\; 3,\; 7\;$ for $a,\; b,\; c\;$ (in any order).
SOLUTION CiP
Let us first look for the triplets $(a,b,c)\in \mathbb{Z_+}\times \mathbb{Z_+}\times \mathbb{Z_+}$
satisfying the inequality (I) and additionally verifying the condition
$$1\leqslant a \leqslant b \leqslant c \tag{C}\;.$$
Then the other triplets satisfying the inequality (I) are obtained by doing all permutations of those found.
Let us then note the equality
$$\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{6}=1\;. \tag{E}$$
We will study three cases : I-III.
I. If $a\geqslant 2$ and $b\geqslant 3$ then inequality (I) is satisfied for "sufficiently large" $c$.(Anyway $c \geqslant 7$, taking into account the equality (E); precisely $c \geqslant \left [\frac{1}{1-\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}}\right]+1$,$[.]$ being the floor function , but this precision is not necessary in solving.) In this case we have
$$\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c} \leqslant \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{7}=\frac{41}{42}.$$
We have concluded (S). Equality is reached only for $a=2,\;b=3,\;c=7\;$, otherwise the above inequality is strict.
II. The values $a=2\;$ and $b=2\;$ contradict inequality (I), so this case is not possible.
III. Neither can $a=1\;$ because of the same inequality (I).
Example: for $a=b=3$ we have $\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{c}$ and this last expression is $<1$ for $c\geqslant 4$. But then
$$\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}\leqslant \frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{4}=\frac{11}{12}=\frac{77}{84}=\frac{82}{82}=\frac{41}{42}\;;$$
we get a strict inequality.
$\blacksquare$