duminică, 14 iunie 2026

GOD and Mathematics

 So says one of us : Daniel ONOFREI


Today I will publish a copy of an old magazine. I mentioned this number somewhere before...

Almost every article has something to comment on... We'll put it at the end, maybe they'll be the source of future posts.


Nostalgic comments


                1.  First, pages 71-73, the Problems given at the Admissions Competition at the University of Timisoara, when I also applied. The exact order of the days was 1. Algebra, 2. Mathematical Analysis 3. Geometry and Trigonometry. I got an average of 9.85...

                2.  Pages 63-66, Problems from the Local Phase of the Mathematical Olympiad. I was in Grade 12. I seem to remember Problem 3921.

                3.  On Cover 2, I was informed that the magazine is no longer being delivered individually

                4. Two trigonometric identities without variables, 3831 (page 51) and 3928 (page 67) -- at points 10 and 11 on the Page here.

                5.  Pages 8-11, a nice article by Dorin ANDRICA, about sequences that have an intervening limit point, e.g.  $(\sin n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$.

                 6.  Now Friends and EnemiesAurel DOBOȘAN (an article on page 17), the one who praised me at the National Phase of the 1977 Mathematics Olympiad, for solving a Geometry problem using the Reciprocal Bisector Theorem.

                Titu ANDREESCU, with an article that impressed me this time (pages 12-14) generalizing two IMO Problems from 1979

                Cornel BĂLTEANU, who "blowed" my girlfriend DIANA URECHESCU (sister of my high school classmate, GABRIELA Urechescu) has an article on page 15

                7. A Magazine COMPETITION was also inaugurated (pag 81), in which I participated "for fun" with my college colleague Costică BUȘE...

                8.  From the Proposed Problems (pages 35-62) I see that I solved 3810 (I posted it somewhere here and on the Blog), here are 3895 and 3899, I lost them somewhere among my notebooks from my youth.

$\blacksquare \; \blacksquare$

sâmbătă, 13 iunie 2026

Familia mea

 


Duminică, 01 MARTIE 2026

De la stânga la dreapta : Sus - VICTOR (fiul meu, 34 ani) ; VASILE VĂCAR (socrul meu, 90 ani) ; PETRU-VASILE CIOBANU (eu, 65 ani)
                                        Jos - TAMARA VĂCAR (soacra mea, mama sotiei, 86 ani; ironic, avea numele de fata tot Ciobanu) ; ALEXANDRA (fiica mea, 34 ani) ; LILIANE-CHRISTINE (soția mea, 61 ani)


A L I N A , fiindcă toate acestea trebuie să poarte un nume, un singur nume, le-am spus IZVOARELE

 Este...și nu este cea mai mare tragedie în postarea de aici... Cândva am să o rog să activăm pagina ALINA  3 SECONDS...cu unele modifiări....

.....

Aş vrea să cred că NOROCUL meu ca te-am întâlnit și ne-norocul tău că m-ai întâlnit să nu dea ca rezultat ZERO. Să fi rămas fiecare cu ceva...

.....

Am văzut aceasta idee în poezia "CONTABILITATE" de Marin SORESCU... 

Vine o vreme

Când trebuie să tragem sub noi

O linie neagră

Și să facem socoteala.


Câteva momente când era să fim fericiți,

Câteva momente când era să fim frumoși,

Câteva momente când era să fim geniali.

Ne-am întâlnit de câteva ori

Cu niște munți, cu niște copaci, cu niște ape

(Pe unde-or mai fi? Mai trăiesc?)

Toate acestea fac un viitor luminos-

Pe care l-am trăit.


O femeie pe care am iubit-o

Și cu aceeași femeie care nu ne-a iubit

Fac zero.


Un sfert de an de studii

Fac mai multe miliarde de cuvinte furajere

A căror înțelepciune am eliminat-o treptat.

Și, în sfârșit, o soartă

Și cu încă o soartă (de unde-o mai fi ieșit?)

Fac două (Scriem una și ținem una,

Poate, cine știe, există și viață de apoi).


— Marin Sorescu, 2003

Sursă: Poezie.ro


       Repun aici discutia de Vineri, 12 IUNIE 2026 ; vezi si fisierul  ALINA 4 . M-au sfâșiat cuvintele ei de aici :

................................................................

[22:49:45] ultima melodie pe care ti-o trimit

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0KBvq5BNxTY&list=RD0KBvq5BNxTY&index=1

nu ai stiut sa gestionezi o femeie ca mine....si e ok asta

.........................................................................................

Nu am puterea acum sa mai fac niciun comentariu....Aici, și în celelalte fișiere : ALINA 1 , 2 , 3  sunt cuvintele noastre...o parte din sufletele noastre...

  TE IUBESC !

.
.

.
.
.

.

.

La ora  [23:53:00] mia29 si-a schimbat nickul cu izvoarele....si au stat pana tarziu... Eu am iesit...


miercuri, 10 iunie 2026

A problem with Symmetric Polynomials (II) // Szimmetrikus polinomokkal kapcsolatos probléma (II)

 It's related to the post here.


          A related problem appeared in Issue 2 /1978 of the  "Revista Matematica a Elevilor din Timisoara" (Mathematical Magazine of Students from Timisoara).

See other magazines here and hereIf you scan the QR code on page 2 you have access to my Electronic Library.


   "3445.  Prove that if  $a+b+c=0$ ,  then

$2(a^5+b^5+c^5)=5abc(a^2+b^2+c^2) \tag{1}$

$10(a^7+b^7+c^7)=7(a^2+b^2+c^2)(a^5+b^5+c^5) \tag{2}$

{no Author}  "

Solution CiP

               The algebraic relation  (1)  was demonstrated in the aforementioned post (see  (7)  there).

               For  (2) , a similar path would require a decomposition of 

 $P(a,b,c)=(a+b+c)^7-a^7-b^7-c^7$

For  $a+b=0\;\Rightarrow\;P(a,-a,c)=c^7+a^7-a^7-c^7=0\;\Rightarrow\; (a+b) \mid P(a,b,c).$

so  $P(a,b,c)=(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)\cdot Q(a,b,c)\;,\;deg(Q)=4.$  

Unfortunately, the polynomial  $Q$  has a more complicated form, and which, as we discussed with COPILOT, is irreducible over  $\mathbb{Q}[a,b,c]$ :

$(a+b+c)^7-a^7-b^7-c^7=(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)\cdot $

$\cdot[a^4+b^4+c^4+2(a^3b+a^3c+b^3a+b^3c+c^3a+c^3b)+ \tag{3}$

$+3(a^2b^2+b^2c^2+c^2a^2)+4(a^2bc+b^2ca+c^2ab)] $

Although we could start with  (3)  and use the condition  $a+b+c=0$, we prefer an easier path.

               Lemma   $(x+y)^7-x^7-y^7=7xy(x+y)(x^2+xy+y^2)^2 \tag{4}$

      Proof of Lemma : For  $L(x,y):=(x+y)^7-x^7-y^7$  we have  $L(0,y)=0=L(x,0)=L(x,-x)$  so

$L(x,y)=xy(x+y)\cdot N(x,y)\;,\;deg(N)=4 \tag{5}$

Finding  $N(x,y)$  is not easy here either, so we start from the development of  $(x+y)^7$ , guided by the suggestion in  (5) :

$(x+y)^7-x^7-y^7=7x^6y+21x^5y^2+35x^4y^3+35x^3y^4+21x^2y^5+7xy^6=$

$=7xy(x^5+x^4y+2x^4y+2x^3y^2+3x^3y^2+3x^2y^3+2x^2y^3+2xy^4+xy^4+y^5)=$

$=7xy(x+y)(x^4+2x^3y+3x^2y^2+2xy^3+y^4)=7xy(x+y)(x^4+x^2y^2+y^4+2x^3y+2xy^3+2x^2y^2)=7xy(x+y)(x^2+xy+y^2)^2$

$\square\;Lemma$


          Now we will use the condition  $a+b+c=0$ . We take from the mentioned post the relations ( (5)  and  (7)  from there)   :

$\sum ab=-\frac{1}{2}\sum a^2 \tag{5}$

$\sum a^5=\frac{5}{2}abc \sum a^2 \tag{6}$

We also have, still in this hypothesis

  $a^2+ab+b^2=a^2+(-b-c)(-c-a)+b^2=a^2+b^2+c^2+bc+ca+ab\overset{(5)}{=}$

$=\sum a^2-\frac{1}{2}\sum a^2$ , so

$a^2+ab+b^2=\frac{1}{2}\sum a^2 \tag{7}$

     Now we prove  (2)  as follows :

$a^7+b^7+c^7=-[(a+b)^7-a^7-b^7]\overset{(4)}{=}-7ab(a+b)(a^2+ab+b^2)^2\underset{a+b=-c}{=}$

$=7abc(a^2+ab+b^2)^2\;\underset{squaring\;(7)}{=}\;\;7abc\cdot \frac{1}{4}(\sum a^2)^2=\frac{7}{4}[abc \sum a^2](\sum a^2)=$

$\underset{(6)}{=}\frac{7}{4}\cdot \frac{2}{5}\sum a^5 \sum a^2=\frac{7}{10}\sum a^2\sum a^5$.

$\blacksquare$


          I finally posted the draft of my discussion with COPILOT, whom I asked if

$(a+b+c)^7-a^7-b^7-c^7=(a+b)^2(b+c)^2(c+a)^2\cdot [m(a+b+c)+n]$

          <<<

Salut, frumos exercițiu 😊

Expresia
[ (a+b+c)^7-a^7-b^7-c^7 ]
nu se poate scrie de forma
[ (a+b)^2(b+c)^2(c+a)^2,[m(a+b+c)+n] ]
— factorul tău este prea mare.

Factorizarea corectă

Se știe (și se poate verifica prin dezvoltare) că pentru puteri impare (n\ge 3):

[ (a+b+c)^n-a^n-b^n-c^n ] este divizibilă prin ((a+b)(b+c)(c+a)).

Pentru (n=7), factorizarea este:

[ \begin{aligned} (a+b+c)^7-a^7-b^7-c^7 &=7(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)\cdot Q(a,b,c), \end{aligned} ]

unde

[ \begin{aligned} Q(a,b,c)=;&a^4+b^4+c^4\ &+2(a^3b+a^3c+b^3a+b^3c+c^3a+c^3b)\ &+3(a^2b^2+a^2c^2+b^2c^2)\ &+4(a^2bc+ab^2c+abc^2). \end{aligned} ]

Deci descompunerea „frumoasă” este:

[ \boxed{ (a+b+c)^7-a^7-b^7-c^7 =7(a+b)(b+c)(c+a),Q(a,b,c) } ]

De ce nu merge forma ta

Dacă pui (c=0), obții:

[ (a+b)^7-a^7-b^7 ]

RHS-ul tău ar deveni:

[ (a+b)^2\cdot b^2\cdot a^2,[m(a+b)+n], ]

care are factor (a^2b^2(a+b)^2). Dar expresia reală ((a+b)^7-a^7-b^7) are doar factor (ab(a+b)), nu la pătrat. Deci forma cu ((a+b)^2(b+c)^2(c+a)^2[m(a+b+c)+n]) nu poate fi corectă pentru niciun (m,n).

Dacă vrei, putem încerca împreună să deducem (Q(a,b,c)) pas cu pas, nu doar să-l iau „gata făcut”.



Q nu se mai descompune ??

Da, întrebarea e foarte bună—merită verificat dacă (Q) mai are factori „frumoși”.

Avem
[ (a+b+c)^7-a^7-b^7-c^7 =7(a+b)(b+c)(c+a),Q(a,b,c), ] unde [ \begin{aligned} Q(a,b,c)=;&a^4+b^4+c^4\ &+2(a^3b+a^3c+b^3a+b^3c+c^3a+c^3b)\ &+3(a^2b^2+a^2c^2+b^2c^2)\ &+4(a^2bc+ab^2c+abc^2). \end{aligned} ]

Se mai poate factoriza (Q)?

Observă câteva lucruri:

  • Simetrie: (Q) este simetric în (a,b,c), dar nu este omogen în „tipul” termenilor (coeficienții sunt 1,2,3,4).
  • Test rapid de factori simpli:
    • Nu are factor ((a+b)): dacă pui (a=-b), obții [ Q(-b,b,c)=b^4+c^4+2(-b^3c+b^3c+c^3(-b)+c^3b)+3(b^2c^2+b^2c^2)+4(\dots) ] care nu este identic zero.
    • La fel, nu are factor ((a+b+c)): dacă pui (c=-(a+b)), rezultatul nu devine 0.
  • Dacă (Q) ar avea factori de tip ((a+b)), ((b+c)), ((c+a)) sau ((a+b+c)), atunci expresia totală ar avea acești factori la puteri mai mari, ceea ce contrazice comportamentul când, de exemplu, (c=0) (unde știm că ((a+b)^2) nu divide ((a+b)^7-a^7-b^7)).

Concluzia scurtă:
[ Q(a,b,c)\ \text{este ireductibil peste }\mathbb{R} \text{ (și peste }\mathbb{Q}\text{) în factori polinomiali „simpli” în }a,b,c. ]

Adică nu se mai descompune într-un produs de factori de grad mai mic cu coeficienți reali/rationali, de tipul celor „clasici” ((a+b)), ((a+b+c)), etc.

Dacă vrei, putem încerca să-l „spargem” formal ca produs de două polinoame de grad 2 în (a,b,c) și să vezi concret de ce nu ies coeficienții.

>>>


GMB 8 / 1978

          La Rubrica REZOLVATORILOR de PROBLEME , pagina 361, apare si numele meu (am subliniat) :TIMISOARA , Lic. industrial nr. 2 cl XI Ciobanu Petru (146)

          In "2005 Tenure Test" , Problem II, point g) of the previous post, we have the very Sylvester Problem on page 323. It is exactly with the same demonstration. I took it from another source....(I don't know which one )

In the PROBLEM SOLVERS section, page 361, my name also appears (I underlined it):
TIMISOARA, Lic. industrial no. 2 cl XI Ciobanu Petru (146)


          Today we will play with a problem whose author we talked about here not long ago.

     " E : 6305.  Let there be 6 cubes with unequal sides, with the measures of the sides being natural numbers. Determine the volume of each cube, so that the 10 cubes together occupy a volume of 444 cubic meters.
{author :} Liviu PODGORNEI, student, Oltenița "


ANSWER CiP

The six cubes have sides of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 meters respectively.


Solution CiP

          If we denote by  $a,\;b,\;c,\;d,\;e,\;f\;$ the dimensions (in meters) of the six cubes, then $1\leqslant a<b<c<d<e<f$  and 

$a^3+b^3+c^3+d^3+e^3+f^3=441 \tag{1}$

But, since the cubes have unequal sides, it results :

$a\geqslant 1\;,\;b\geqslant 2\;,\;c\geqslant 3\;,\;d\geqslant 4\;,\;e\geqslant 5\;,\;f\geqslant 6 \tag{2}$

Then, the sum of their volumes  $a^3+b^3+c^3+d^3+e^3+f^3$  is  $\geqslant 1^3+2^3+3^3+4^3+5^3+6^3=1+8+27+64+125+216=441$

     It means that in  (2)  we must have the equal sign everywhere.

$\blacksquare$

Pregatire TITULARIZARE 2005 , 2006

 O teorema importanta :




Test de Titularizare 2005 , si rezolvarea :

















Test Oficial 2006





marți, 9 iunie 2026

GMB 8 / 2005

 In GMB 8/2005, pages 378 (romanian version) and 380 (english version)

(other magazines here)

               "C : 2909.  For any positive integer  $n$  let  

$S_n=1\cdot 2\cdot 3+2\cdot 3\cdot 4+\dots +n(n+1)(n+2).$  Prove that :

a)  $\sqrt{S_n}\in\mathbb{R}\setminus \mathbb{Q}$ , for all  $n\in \mathbb{N^*}$  ;  b)  $\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}+S_n}\in\mathbb{Q}$ , for all  $n\in\mathbb{N^*}.$

{author :} Petre SIMION, Bucharest"


ANSWER CiP

$$S_n=\sum_{k=1}^nk\cdot (k+1) \cdot (k+2)=\fbox{$\frac{n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}{4}$} \tag{1}$$

a) It should be (cf. Lemma)   $\sqrt{S_n}\in\mathbb{N}$ , but  $\frac{n^2+3n}{2}<\sqrt{S_n}<\frac{n^2+3n}{2}+1$          (2)

b) $\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}+S_n}=\frac{n^2+3n+1}{2} \tag{3}$


Solution CiP , with COPILOT help

(for the help given by COPILOT see the draft at the end)

          We observe that  

$k(k+1)(k+2)=\frac{k(k+1)(k+2)\cdot 4}{4}=k(k+1)(k+2)\cdot \frac{(k+3)-(k-1)}{4}$ 

so

$k(k+1)(k+2)=\frac{(k+3)(k+2)(k+1)k}{4}-\frac{(k+2)(k+1)k(k-1)}{4} \tag{4}$

Summing in  (4)  from  $k=1\; to\;k=n$ , we obtain on the right the telescopic sum

$\left ( \color{Blue}{\frac{4\cdot 3\cdot 2\cdot 1}{4}}-\frac{3\cdot 2\cdot 1\cdot 0}{4}\right )+\left (\color{Orange}{\frac{5\cdot 4\cdot 3\cdot 2}{4}}-\color{Blue}{\frac{4\cdot 3\cdot 2\cdot 1}{4}}\right)+$

$+\left (\frac{6\cdot 5\cdot 4\cdot 3}{4}-\color{Orange}{\frac{5\cdot 4\cdot 3\cdot 2}{4}} \right )+\dots +\left (\frac{(n+3)(n+2)(n+1)n}{4}-\frac{(n+2)(n+1)n(n-1)}{4}\right)$

Terms of the same color are reduced and the result from  (1)  remains.


                    a)  $\sqrt{S_n}=\frac{\sqrt{n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}}{2}$  so according to Lemma , we must have

  $\sqrt{n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\in\mathbb{N}\tag{5}$.

But the number in  (5)  is even because out of four consecutive numbers  $n\;,\;n+1\;,\;n+2\;,\;n+3\;$ , one is a multiple of  4 , so

$\frac{\sqrt{n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}}{2}\in\mathbb{N} \tag{5'}$

          But it is easy to show that we have the inequalities  (2)

 [    $\color{Red}{n(n+3)}=n^2+3n<\color{Red}{n^2+3n+2}\;\;\Leftrightarrow $$\Leftrightarrow\;\;\color{Red}{n(n+3)<(n+1)(n+2)} \tag{6}$

$\Rightarrow\; n^2(n+3)^2<n\color{Red}{(n+1)(n+2)}(n+3)\;\Rightarrow\;\frac{n(n+3)}{2}<\sqrt{S_n}$  so the left side in (2). It also results from  (6)  $\color{Red}n(n+1)(n+2)\color{Red}{(n+3)}<(n+1)^2(n+2)^2\;\Rightarrow\;\sqrt{S_n}<\frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{2}=\frac{n^2+3n}{2}+1$  so the right side in (2). Note that  $\frac{n^2+3n}{2}\in\mathbb{N}\;(\forall) n\in\mathbb{N}.$      ]

Then  (5)  is impossible, because it is strictly contained between two consecutive integers.


                     b)  We can write  $S_n=\frac{n(n+3)(n+1)(n+2)}{4}=\frac{(n^2+3n)(n^2+3n+2)}{4}=$

$=\frac{[(n^2+3n+1)-1][n^2+3n+1)+1]}{4}=\frac{(n^2+3n+1)^2-1}{4}$  so  $\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}+S_n}$  has the value from  (3).

$\blacksquare$


          Remark CiP  Draft of the discussion with COPILOT :

<<

Suma

[ S = 1\cdot 2\cdot 3 ;+; 2\cdot 3\cdot 4 ;+; \dots ;+; n(n+1)(n+2) ]

are o expresie închisă foarte elegantă:

[ \boxed{S = \frac{n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}{4}} ]


De ce funcționează formula

Termenul general este:

[ k(k+1)(k+2) = k^3 + 3k^2 + 2k ]

Suma devine:

[ S = \sum_{k=1}^n (k^3 + 3k^2 + 2k) ]

Folosind formulele standard pentru
(suma;cuburilor),
(suma;pătratelor),
(suma;primelor;n;numere),

și simplificând, totul se reduce exact la:

[ S = \frac{n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}{4} ]


Verificare rapidă pentru n = 1, 2, 3

  • n = 1:
    Stânga: (1\cdot 2\cdot 3 = 6)
    Dreapta: (\frac{1\cdot 2\cdot 3\cdot 4}{4} = 6)

  • n = 2:
    Stânga: (6 + 24 = 30)
    Dreapta: (\frac{2\cdot 3\cdot 4\cdot 5}{4} = 30)

  • n = 3:
    Stânga: (6 + 24 + 60 = 90)
    Dreapta: (\frac{3\cdot 4\cdot 5\cdot 6}{4} = 90)

Totul se potrivește perfect.


Dacă vrei, pot și demonstra formula prin:

  • inducție
  • metoda diferențelor finite
  • identități telescopice

Vrei o demonstrație completă printr-una dintre aceste metode?


Telescopica

Hai să o facem telescopic, „curat”, cu combinații.


1. Scriem termenul general în formă combinatorică

Observăm că

[ k(k+1)(k+2) = 6 \cdot \binom{k+2}{3} ]

pentru că

[ \binom{k+2}{3} = \frac{(k+2)(k+1)k}{6}. ]

Deci suma devine

[ S = \sum_{k=1}^n k(k+1)(k+2) = 6 \sum_{k=1}^n \binom{k+2}{3}. ]


2. Transformăm suma într-o sumă telescopică

Folosim identitatea clasică:

[ \binom{m}{r} = \binom{m+1}{r} - \binom{m+1}{r-1}. ]

Aplicată pentru (r = 3), obținem:

[ \binom{k+2}{3} = \binom{k+3}{4} - \binom{k+2}{4}. ]

Deci

[ \sum_{k=1}^n \binom{k+2}{3} = \sum_{k=1}^n \left[\binom{k+3}{4} - \binom{k+2}{4}\right]. ]

Aceasta este o sumă telescopică: termenii se anulează în lanț.

Scriem câțiva termeni:

[ \begin{aligned} &\left[\binom{4}{4} - \binom{3}{4}\right] + \left[\binom{5}{4} - \binom{4}{4}\right] + \left[\binom{6}{4} - \binom{5}{4}\right] + \dots + \left[\binom{n+3}{4} - \binom{n+2}{4}\right]. \end{aligned} ]

Tot ce e „intermediar” se taie, rămâne doar:

[ \sum_{k=1}^n \binom{k+2}{3} = \binom{n+3}{4} - \binom{3}{4}. ]

Dar (\binom{3}{4} = 0), deci

[ \sum_{k=1}^n \binom{k+2}{3} = \binom{n+3}{4}. ]


3. Punem totul la un loc

Revenim la suma inițială:

[ S = 6 \sum_{k=1}^n \binom{k+2}{3} = 6 \binom{n+3}{4}. ]

Acum calculăm:

[ 6 \binom{n+3}{4} = 6 \cdot \frac{(n+3)(n+2)(n+1)n}{4!} = 6 \cdot \frac{(n+3)(n+2)(n+1)n}{24} = \frac{n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}{4}. ]


Concluzie

[ \boxed{ \sum_{k=1}^n k(k+1)(k+2) = \frac{n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}{4} } ]

Dacă vrei, putem face și o versiune pur algebrică de telescopare, găsind direct un polinom (F(k)) cu (F(k+1)-F(k)=k(k+1)(k+2)).

>>

{end Rem}

luni, 8 iunie 2026

DE CE? mi-ai făcut asta , ÎNGERE ?? // WHY? did you do this to me, ANGEL??

 DE CE?  mi-ai făcut asta , ÎNGERE  ??


Nu este nimic indecent în asta ! (Mai indecentă este poza mea cu SONDA)


Probabil ai blocat afisarea imaginii la anumiti utilizatori doar... Noroc ca mai am un telefon nou, in care te-am trecut si pe tine la CONTACTE, iar acolo inca mai aparea imaginea pe care credeam ca am pierdut-o.

Am vorbit aseara cu LadyYellow, despre cautarile din viata si noroc. I-am "recitat" versurile (i-am spus ca este din EMINESCU) :
"Orice noroc si-ntinde-aripele
Gonit de clipele
Starii pe loc"
Mi-a raspuns instantaneu : "Stelele-n Cer"....
(Aceste versuri m-au facut sa nu renunt sa o caut pe DORINA la Mamaia....Si am gasit-o, oricat de mare ar fi fost plaja....)

Si ma e un vers care ma duce cu gandul la tine, ALINA : 
"Pleacă-te Îngere"


duminică, 7 iunie 2026

A cartoon of the Stolz–Cesàro Theorem // La caricatura di Teorema Stolz-Cesàro

 In the Mathematical Review of Students from Timișoara 1/1978, RMT for short, I found a problem (page 69) that I solved in my time :

 "3304.  Given the sequences  $\{a_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\;,\;\;\{b_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ with the properties :

 (i)  $\{b_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$  is strictly monotone and unbounded.

                               (ii)  exists  $\displaystyle \lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{a_n}{b_n}$

                               (iii)  $\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}+\frac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}=2\;,\;\;(\forall) n\in\mathbb{N}.$

                           Prove that  $\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{a_n}{b_n}=0.$

{author :} Titu ANDREESCU, student, Timișoara"


Solution CiP

              The condition  (iii)  is written equivalently : $\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}-1+\frac{b_{n+1}}{b_n}-1=0\;\Leftrightarrow$

$\Leftrightarrow\;\frac{a_{n+1}-a_n}{a_n}=-\frac{b_{n+1}-b_n}{b_n}\;\Leftrightarrow\;\frac{a_{n+1}-a_n}{b_{n+1}-b_n}=-\frac{a_n}{b_n} \tag{1}$

By  (ii)  the limit  $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{a_n}{b_n}$  exists, and then from  (1)  it follows that the limit  $\displaystyle \lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_{n+1}-a_n}{b_{n+1}-b_n}$  also exists. Then, according to Stolz–Cesàro theorem

$\displaystyle \lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{a_n}{b_n}=\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_{n+1}-a_n}{b_{n+1}-b_n}\overset{(1)}{=}-\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{a_n}{b_n}$,

hence  $\displaystyle \lim_{n\to \infty}\frac{a_n}{b_n}=0.$

QED

$\blacksquare$

sâmbătă, 6 iunie 2026

A necessary correction: it seems that I was wrong in my calculations, not only in life

 The answer to the Problem in the post here is WRONG. It was brought to my attention by a commenter, unfortunately anonymous.

          The answer will be replaced there with this one :


Corrected   ANSWER CiP

The statement is NOT true for polynomials of degree 4 :

If  $P(x)=x^4\;,\;\;Q(x)=x^4+x^2\;,\;\; R(x)=2x^4+x^2\;\;$  then  $P(x)\leqslant Q(x)\leqslant R(x)$

but  $\lambda \cdot P(x)+(1-\lambda)\cdot R(x)=(2-\lambda)\cdot x^4+(1-\lambda)\cdot x^2\neq Q(x)$

$\square$

vineri, 5 iunie 2026

Three Nice Polynomials of Degree III // Tre pæne polynomier af grad III

 We will solve Problem 7 (page 38, in the magazine from yesterday's Post) from Team Selection Test(TSTs) 1 for IMO.

" Problem 7.  Consider three polynomials of degree 3 with real 

coefficients $P,\;Q,\;R$  such that  $P(x)\leqslant Q(x)\leqslant R(x)$  for any real  $x$

  and, in addition, there exists a real number  $a$  such that  $P(a)=R(a).$

  Show that there exists a constant  $\lambda \in [0,\;1]$  with the property

  $Q=\lambda P+(1-\lambda)R.$  Does the statement remain true in the case 

                         when  $P,\;Q,\;R$  have degree 4?

{authors : } I. Cuculescu and L. Panaitopol, Bucharest"


ANSWER CiP (see correction)

It is not entirely true for polynomials of degree 4. For example, if 

$P(x)=x^4\;,\;\;Q(x)=x^4+x^2\;,\;\;R(x)=x^4+2x^2$  then  $P(x)\leqslant Q(x)\leqslant R(x)$

  and we have $Q(x)=\lambda \cdot P(x)+(1-\lambda)\cdot R(x)$  but with  $\lambda =-1 \not \in [0,\;1]$


Solution CiP

                   Obviously  $P(a)=Q(a)=R(a).$  Let's define polynomials

$S(x)=R(x)-Q(x)\;\geqslant 0\;,\;\forall x\;\;;\;\;T(x)=R(x)-P(x)\;\geqslant 0\;,\;\forall x \tag{1}$

          We have  $S(a)=0$  therefore  $S(x)=(x-a)S_2(x)$ , for a certain polynomial  $S_2$  of degree 2.

Since when  $x$  passes through the value  $x=a$ , the polynomial  $S$  does not change sign, we must have 

$S(x)=(x-a)^2\cdot S_1(x) \tag{2}$

with  $S_1$-a first degree polynomial. But the polynomial  $S_1$  should have a root, through which if   $x$  passes, the expression in  (2)  changes sign again. Contradiction, so  $S_1$  is a constant.

          In exactly the same way results

$T(x)=(x-a)^2\cdot T_1(x) \tag{3}$

with  $T_1$  a constant.

          Let  $\lambda :=\frac{S(x)}{T(x)}\overset{(2)}{\underset{(3)}{=}}\frac{S_1}{T_1}=constant\;$.  Since  $\lambda=\frac{R(x)-Q(x)}{R(x)-P(x)}$  and  $R(x)-Q(x)\leqslant R(x)-P(x)$  we have  $0\leqslant \lambda \leqslant 1$  and 

 $Q(x)=\lambda \cdot P(x)+(1-\lambda )\cdot R(x).$

$\blacksquare$

joi, 4 iunie 2026

Problem E : 6271

 Click on the image and use the password : ogeometrie The QR code on page 2 contains a link to the Books in my Electronic Library. (Click on the year of publication. Same password if needed.) A collection of important magazines is at the letter G : GAZETA MATEMATICĂ seria B.

On page 292 :
                          " E : 6271*.  Find the maximum and minimum of the sum  $x+y$
                                                   and the product  $xy$ , knowing that  $5x+6y=150$ ,
 and  $x\; and\; y$  are natural numbers different from zero.           
{author : } Gh. MARGHESCU, student, București "


ANSWER CiP

$max\;(x+y)=29$  for  $x=24\;, \;y=5$
$min\;(x+y)=26$   for  $x=6\;,\;y=20$

$max\;(x\cdot y)=180$  for  $x=12\;,\;y=15\;\;or\;\;x=18\;,\;y=10$
$min\;(x\cdot y)=120$  for  $x=6\;,\;y=20\;\;or\;\;x=24\;,\;y=5$


Solution CiP

                  We have the relationships :

$5x+6y=150\;\;,\;\;\;5x=150-6y\;\;\;6y=150-5x \tag{1}$

          From  $6\mid 150\;\;and\;\;6\mid 6y$  and from the second formula (1) it follows that  $6\mid 5x$  and because  $gcd(5,6)=1$  we have  $6\mid x$  so

$x=6\cdot x_1\;,\;\;x_1\in\mathbb{N^*} \tag{2}$

Similarly, we have  $5\mid 150\;\;and\;\;5\mid 5x$ , and from the third formula (1) it results  $5\mid 6y$ , so

$y=5\cdot y_1\;\;\;y_1\in\mathbb{N^*} \tag{3}$

          Then  $5x+6y=150\;\;\overset{(2)}{\underset{(3)}{\Leftrightarrow}}\;\;\;5\cdot 6x_1+6\cdot 5y_1=150\Leftrightarrow$

$\Leftrightarrow\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;x_1+y_1=5 \tag{4}$

If  $x_1=n\in\mathbb{N^*}$ , then  $y_1\overset{(4)}{=}5-x_1=5-n$ , so the nonzero natural number solutions for  (4)  are :

$x_1=n\;\;,\;\;\;y_1=5-n\;\;\;\;\;1\leqslant n \leqslant 4 \tag{5}$

But

$x+y\;\;\;\overset{(2)\;(3)}{\underset{(5)}{=}}\;\;6\cdot n+5\cdot (5-n)=n+25 \tag{6}$

and then  $1\leqslant n \leqslant 4 \Leftrightarrow26\leqslant n+25 \leqslant 29\underset{(6)}{\Leftrightarrow}$

$\Leftrightarrow\;\;\;\;\;26 \leqslant x+y \leqslant 29 \tag{7}$

We have in  (7)  $x+y=26$  for  $n=1$ , so  $x_1=1\;,\;y_1=4$  and we get from  (2)  and  (3)  $x=6\;,\;y=20$  for the minimum value.  And  $x+y=29$  for  $n=4$ , so $x_1=4\;,\;y_1=1$  so  $x=24\;,\;y=5$  for the maximum value.


          Since there are a small number of values ​​for  $x\; and\; y$ , we will list all the products  $x\cdot y$  in the table below, from where we will also obtain the answer.

\begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c}n&1&2&3&4\\\hline x&6&12&18&24\\\hline y&20&15&10&5\\\hline x\cdot y&120&180&180&120\\\end{array}

$\blacksquare$

miercuri, 3 iunie 2026

The E : 17461 problem, half easy, half hard // Задача E: 17461, наполовину простая, наполовину сложная

 From GMB (page 159), also proposed for 5th grade.

          " E : 17461.  Let  $N=3+3^2+3^3+\dots+3^{4n+1}\;,\;n\in\mathbb{N}.$

            a)  Show that  $2N+3$  s a perfect square.

            b)  For  $n$  even natural numbers, determine the last two digits of  $N$.

                                                                                  {author : } Marin CHIRCIU, Pitești "


Partial  ANSWER  CiP

a)  $2N+3=(3^{2n+1})^2$

b) The answer is not a unique number. We have :

$3+3^2+3^3+3^4+3^5+3^6+3^7+3^8+3^9=29\;5\color{Yellow}{23}$

$3+3^2+3^3+\dots+3^{17}=193\;710\;2\color{Pink}{43}$


Solution CiP

                    a) $2N+3=\color{Red}{3}+N+N=$

$=\color{Red}{3}+(3+3)+(3^2+3^2)+(3^3+3^3)+\dots+(3^{4n+1}+3^{4n+1})=$

$=\color{Red}{(3+3+3)}+(3^2+3^2)+(3^3+3^3)+\dots+(3^{4n+1}+3^{4n+1}).$

Let's observe that  $3+3+3=3^2$ ...and in general

$3^k+3^k+3^k=3^{k+1} \tag{1}$

Then, the red parenthesis results is $\color{Red}{3^2}$ , which appears as the term in the second parenthesis thus :

$(\color{Red}{3^2}+3^2+3^2)+(3^3+3^3)+\dots +(3^{4n+1}+3^{4n+1}).$

     Continuing this calculation, we finally obtain the result

$2N+3=\color{Red}{3^{4n+1}}+3^{4n+1}+3^{4n+1}\underset{(1)}{=}3^{4n+2}=(3^{2n+1})^2\;,$

i.e. a perfect square.

$\square$

marți, 2 iunie 2026

Our Beloved Magazine "GAZETA MATEMATICĂ series B" - GMB 3 / 2026 // Notre Magazine Bien-Aimé "GAZETA MATEMATICĂ série B" - GMB 3 / 2026

  Click on the image and use the password : ogeometrie .The QR code on page 2 contains a link to the Books in my Electronic Library. (Click on the year of publication. Same password if needed.) A collection of important magazines is at the letter G : GAZETA MATEMATICĂ seria B.


          A problem to illustrate the love for numbers, proposed for 5th grade (page 159) :

                    "E : 17457 .   Write the number  $220^{2n+1}$  as the sum of 5 distinct

                      nonzero perfect squares. 

{author : } Marin CHIRCIU, Pitești "


ANSWER CiP

$220=1^2+3^2+4^2+5^2+13^2$  hence

$220^{2n+1}=(220^n)^2+(3\cdot 220^n)^2+(4 ^2\cdot 220^n)^2+(5\cdot 220^n)^2+(13\cdot 220^n)^2$


Solution CiP

               We have  $220^{2n+1}=(220^n)^2\cdot 220^1$ , so let's try to write the number  $220$  as the sum of five distinct nonzero perfect squares. 

We write some sums,  $\color{Green}{highlighting}$  a perfect square term:

$220=\color{Green}{196}+24$

$220=\color{Green}{169}+51$

$220=\color{Green}{144}+76$

..........................

But any number is written as the sum of four squares, according to Lagrange's Four-Square Theorem, so let's try this with the second term in the writings above.

          Asking a friend I found out that : 

<< Adevărul e că  $24$ are foarte puține reprezentări valide.

Singura reprezentare cu pătrate întregi ne-negative este:

24=42+22+22+02

>>

In translation : <<The truth is that 24 has very few valid representations. The only representation with non-negative integer squares is: ... >> But the squares here are not all nonzero and not all distinct.

Moving on to term $51$ , the same friend gave me the answer you see in the first row above.

The problem is now solved.

$\blacksquare$

The Exercise Supplement of the Mathematical Gazette // Príloha k cvičeniam v Matematickom vestníku

 Click on the image and use the password : ogeometrie .The QR code on page 2 contains a link to the Books in my Electronic Library. (Click on the year of publication. Same password if needed.) A collection of important magazines is at the letter G : GAZETA MATEMATICĂ seria B.

       
                 To see how simple the exercises and problems are, we will take the following problem proposed  for 6th grade:
    
               "S.E26.100.  The degree measures of the angles of an acute-angled triangle
 are expressed as prime numbers. Prove that the triangle is isosceles.
* * * {no author}"


ANSWER CiP

The triangle has angle measures  $2^{\circ}\;,\;\;89^{\circ}\;,\;\;89^{\circ}$


    Solution CiP

               If  $x^{\circ},\;y^{\circ},\;z^{\circ}$  are the angles of this triangle, then :

$x^{\circ}\;,\;y^{\circ},\;z^{\circ}\;<90^{\circ}\;\;and\;\;x^{\circ}+y^{\circ}+z^{\circ}=180^{\circ} \tag{1}$

          Being prime numbers, if they were all odd then their sum would be odd. We contradict (1). So one of the numbers, let's say  $z^{\circ}$  is  $2^{\circ}$.  Then the second condition in (1) becomes :

$x^{\circ}+y^{\circ}=178^{\circ} \tag{2}$

     An obvious solution for  (2) , which meets the requirements of the problem, is  $x^{\circ}=y^{\circ}=89^{\circ}$.  This triangle is isosceles.

     $x^{\circ}\underset{(1)}{<}89^{\circ}\Rightarrow y\underset{(2)}{=}178^{\circ}-x^{\circ}>89^{\circ}$.  And we can still have  $y^{\circ}=90^{\circ}$ ,  which violates all the requirements.

$\blacksquare$

luni, 1 iunie 2026

Relationships between Trigonometric Values ​​Deduced from Equations // Relaciones entre valores trigonométricos deducidos de ecuaciones // In Memoriam Professor Constantin BUȘE

           In the GMB 7/2005, mentioned here, the solution to problem 25223 (published in GMB/1/2005, page 40) appears, which is the source of this post. (With nostalgia, I found on page 299 the name of my college colleague Constantin BUȘE...deceased in the meantime)

         " 25223.  To solve in  $\mathbb{C}$   the equation :  $3x^3-3x+1=0.$

[author : ] Gh. Szöllősy, Sighetul Marmației"


ANSWER

$x_1=\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\cos\frac{5\pi}{18}\;,\;x_2=\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\cos \frac{7\pi}{18}\;,\;x_3=\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\cos\frac{17\pi}{18}$


 Solution

               We are looking for solutions of the kind  $x_t=a\cdot \cos t,\;a>0,\;t\in [0,\pi]$. Then

$3x_t^3-3x_t+1=0\Leftrightarrow 3a^3\cos^3x_t-3a\cos x_t+1=0 \tag{1}$

  Because  $\cos 3t=4\cos^3t-3\cos t$  we are looking to determine  $a$  such that  $\frac{3a^3}{4}=\frac{3a}{3}$  which leads to  $a=\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}.$  Thus we have

$\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}=\frac{3a^3\cos^3x_t-3a\cos x_t}{4\cos^3 x_t-3\cos x_t}\underset{(1)}{=}\frac{-1}{\cos 3t}$

From  $\cos 3t=-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$  we obtain  $3t \in \left \{\pm \frac{5\pi}{6}+2k\pi\right \}\cap [0,\pi]$, so  $t\in \left \{\frac{5\pi}{18},\;\frac{7\pi}{18},\;\frac{17\pi}{18}\right\}$  hence the Answer.

$\blacksquare$


          REMARK CiP  Putting  $x=\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\cdot y$  we see that  $y$  are solutions of the equation

$3\cdot \frac{8}{3\sqrt{3}}y^3-3\cdot \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}y+1=0\;\Leftrightarrow\;8y^3-6y+\sqrt{3}=0 \tag{2}$

that is  $y_{1-3}\in \left \{\cos\frac{5\pi}{18},\;\cos\frac{7\pi}{18},\;\cos\frac{17\pi}{18}=-\cos\frac{\pi}{18}\right \}.$  We therefore have, from Vieta's Formulas :

$\cos\frac{\pi}{18}-\cos\frac{5\pi}{18}-\cos\frac{7\pi}{18}=0$

$\cos \frac{\pi}{18}\cdot \cos \frac{5\pi}{18}-\cos \frac{5\pi}{18}\cdot \cos \frac {7\pi}{18}+\cos \frac{\pi}{18}\cdot \cos \frac{7\pi}{18}=-\frac{3}{4}$

$\cos \frac{\pi}{18}\cdot \cos \frac{5\pi}{18} \cdot \cos \frac{7\pi}{18}=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{8}$

<end REM>

luni, 25 mai 2026

Gheorghe ANDREI - COMPLEX NUMBERS (part II) - Some Problems -- 5 / Gheorghe ANDREI - NUMERE COMPLEXE (partea II) - Câteva Probleme -- 5 / Gheorghe ANDREI – LICZBY ZŁOŻONE (część II) – Niektóre problemy – 5

 I wrote about the book here

It's not for nothing that I wrote somewhere that THIS BOOK IS FULL OF SCRATCHES. (Maybe that's why the author withdrew Part I from sale)


                    We are now debating Problem 62***, page 157 (solved on pages 516-519).

       

                     " 62***.  Calculate  $P_n\; Q_n\;and\; R_n$, where  $n\in \mathbb{N},\;n\geqslant 3,\;a\in\mathbb{R}^*\;:$

 $$a)\;\;\;P_n=\prod_{k=0}^{n-1} \cos \left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )\;;$$

$$b)\;\;Q_n=\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}\sin \left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )\;;$$

$$c)\;\;R_n=\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}\tan \left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )."$$


ANSWER

$a)\;\;P_{2n}=\frac{(-1)^n\sin 2na}{2^{2n-1}}\;\;;\;\;P_{2n+1}=\frac{(-1)^n\cos (2n+1)a}{2^{2n}}$

$b)\;\;Q_n=\frac{\sin na}{2^{n-1}}$

$c)\;\;R_{2n}=-1\;\;;\;\;R_{2n+1}=(-1)^n\tan (2n+1)a$


Solution CiP

               We will start with b). A solution that, at some point, requires a square root extraction is found in TURTOIU Fanică - Probleme de Trigonometrie, Ed. Tehnică, București, 1979 (pages 86-87, Problem 2.38 - received by the kindness of Liviu PODGORNEI). This is a personal attempt.

          Let  $z_k=\cos\left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )+\imath \sin \left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )\;,\;\;0\leqslant k\leqslant n-1.$  We have

$|z_k|=1=z_k\cdot \bar z_k$  so  $\bar z_k=\cos \left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )-\imath \sin \left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )=\frac{1}{z_k}.$  In addition

$z_k^{2n}=\cos 2n \left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )+\imath \sin 2n\left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )=\cos 2na+\imath \sin 2na \tag{1}$

Then

$\sin \left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )=\frac{z_k-\bar z_k}{2\imath}=\frac{z_k-\frac{1}{z_k}}{2\imath}=\frac{z_k^2-1}{2\imath z_k} \tag{2}$

          From  (1)  it follows that the equation

$z^{2n}=\cos 2na+\imath \sin 2na \tag{3}$

has the roots  $\pm z_k\;,\;\;k\in \{0,\;1,\dots ,\;n-1 \}.$  Denoting

$f(z)=z^{2n}-(\cos na +\imath \sin na) \tag{4}$

we have  $f(z)=(z-z_0)(z-z_1)\dots (z-z_{n-1})(z+z_0)(z+z_1)\dots (z+z_{n-1})\;$,  or

$$f(z)=\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}(z^2-z_k^2) \tag{5}$$

From here we go further  $$\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}(z_k^2-1)=(-1)^n\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}(1-z_k^2)=(-1)^nf(1)\overset{(4)}{=}(-1)^n(1-\cos 2na-\sin 2na)=$$

$$=(-1)^n(2\sin^2na-2\imath \sin na \cos na)=(-1)^n(-2\imath^2\sin^2 na-2\imath \sin na \cos na)$$

so

$$\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}(z_k^2-1)=-2\imath (-1)^n\sin na(\cos na+\imath \sin na) \tag{6}$$

          On the other hand

$$\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}z_k=\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}\left [(\cos a+\imath \sin a)\left (\cos \frac{k\pi}{n}+\imath \sin\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )\right]=$$

$$=(\cos a+\imath \sin a)^n\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}\left (\cos \frac{k\pi}{n}+\imath \sin \frac{k\pi}{n}\right )=$$

$$=(\cos na+\imath \sin na)\left [\cos \left (\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}k\right )\frac{\pi}{n}+\imath \sin \left (\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}k\right )\frac{\pi}{n}\right ]=$$

$=(\cos na+\imath \sin na)\left [\cos (n-1)\frac{\pi}{2}+\imath \sin (n-1)\frac{\pi}{2}\right ]$

because  $\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}k=\frac{(n-1)n}{2}.$  Analyzing the cases  $n=4m,\;4m+1,\;4m+2,\;4m+3$  it is immediately seen that  $\cos (n-1)\frac{\pi}{2}+\imath \sin (n-1)\frac{\pi}{2}=-\imath^{n+1}$ , and then the previous calculation gives us

$$\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}z_k=-\imath^{n+1}(\cos na+\imath\sin na) \tag{7}$$


          Now we can finish

$$Q_n=\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}\sin \left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )\overset{(2)}{=}\frac{\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}(z_k^2-1)}{2^n\imath^n\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}z_k}\overset{(6)}{\underset{(7)}{=}}\frac{-2\imath(-1)^n\sin na(\cos na+\imath\sin na)}{2^n\imath^n(-\imath^{n+1})(\cos na+\imath \sin na)}=$$

$=\frac{\imath \cdot (-1)^n\sin na}{2^{n-1}\imath^{2n}\cdot \imath}=\frac{(-1)^n \sin na}{2^{n-1}(-1)^n}=\frac{\sin na}{2^{n-1}}.$  We got the answer of  b).

     Remark CiP   On page 518 the following stupid answer is given :

$$Q_n=\begin{cases}\frac{(-1)^n\cdot \sin na}{2^{n-1}}\;\;\;if\;\;n-even\\\frac{(-1)^{n+1}\cdot \sin na}{2^{n-1}}\;\;\;if\;\;n-odd\end{cases} \tag{Q}$$

............................................................................................................................

                    a)  With the same notations as in point b), first we have

$\cos\left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )=\frac{z_k+\bar z_k}{2}=\frac{z_k^2+1}{2z_k} \tag{8}$

          Then, starting from  (5)  we see that  

$$f(\imath)=\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}(-1-z_k^2)=(-1)^n\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}(z_k^2+1)$$

so

$$\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}(z_k^2+1)=(-1)^nf(\imath) \tag{9}$$

          Then we can write

$$P_n=\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}\cos \left (a+\frac{k\pi}{n}\right )\overset{(8)}{=}\frac{\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}(z_k^2+1)}{2^n\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}z_k}\overset{(7)}{\underset{(9)}{=}}\frac{(-1)^nf(\imath)}{2^n(-\imath^{n+1})(\cos na+\imath \sin na)} \tag{10}$$

But  $f(\imath)\underset{(4)}{=}(-1)^n-\cos 2na-\imath \sin 2na$  and we will treat the  $n-even$  and  $n-odd$  cases separately.

          $\fbox{$n$-even}$

          $f(\imath)=1-\cos na-\imath \sin na=2\sin^2 na-2\imath \sin na \cos na=$

$=-2\imath^2\sin^2 na-2\imath \sin na \cos na=-2\imath \sin na(\cos na+\imath \sin na)$

In  (10)  also appears  $-\imath^{n+1}=-\imath^n\cdot \imath=(-\imath)(-1)^{\frac{n}{2}}$  and then we continue like this

$P_n=\frac{-2\imath \sin na(\cos na+\imath \sin na)}{2^n(-\imath)(-1)^{\frac{n}{2}}(\cos na+\imath \sin na)}=\frac{(-1)^{\frac{n}{2}}\sin na}{2^{n-1}}.$

          $\fbox{$n$-odd}$

          $(-1)^nf(\imath)=-(-1-\cos 2na-\imath \sin 2na)=2\cos^2 na+2\imath \sin na \cos na=$

$=2\cos na(\cos na+\imath \sin na)$

and because  $-\imath^{n+1}=-(-1)^{\frac{n+1}{2}}=-(-1)^{\frac{n-1}{2}+1}=-(-1)^{\frac{n-1}{2}}(-1)=(-1)^{\frac{n-1}{2}}$

we have  $P_n\underset{(10)}{=}\frac{2\cos na(\cos na+\imath \sin na)}{2^n(-1)^{\frac{n-1}{2}}(\cos na+\imath \sin na)}=\frac{(-1)^{\frac{n-1}{2}}\cos na}{2^{n-1}}.$  We got the answer of  a).

      Remark CiP   Although in the solution I used COPILOT, who first told me incorrectly that the minus sign always appears in the formula, then came back and corrected the mistake, we must admit that in the book, on page 517, the correct answer is given. Marius DRĂGAN and Sorin RĂDULESCU are cited as the authors of the solution.

.............................................................................................................................

                    c)  $R_{2n}=\frac{Q_{2n}}{P_{2n}}=\frac{\frac{\sin 2na}{2^{2n-1}}}{\frac{(-1)^n\sin 2na}{2^{2n-1}}}=(-1)^n\;;$

                         $R_{2n+1}=\frac{Q_{2n+1}}{P_{2n+1}}=\frac{\frac{\sin (2n+1)a}{2^{2n}}}{\frac{(-1)^n\cos (2n+1)a}{2^{2n}}}=(-1)^n\tan(2n+1)a.$

$\blacksquare\;\blacksquare\;\blacksquare$