Based on a LinkedIn Post
Then I found a similar oneI thought of a general formula, resulting in the following:PROBLEM In the parallelogram ABCD in the figure below, we denote the
areas of the triangles ABM,\;KLM by \textbf{S}_1,\; \textbf{S}_2 and the areas of the
quadrilaterals ADLM,\;BCKM by \textbf{S}_3,\;\textbf{S}_4. The following relationship holds:
\textbf{S}_3+\textbf{S}_4=\textbf{S}_1-\textbf{S}_2+2 \cdot \sqrt{\textbf{S}_1 \cdot \textbf{S}_2} \tag{1}
Solution CiP
I added additional lines and notations to the figure, compared to those mentioned in the statement: EF \parallel AB,DC,\;EF \ni M,\;\;PQ\perp AB,DC,\;PQ \ni M.
It is known that the ratio of the areas of two similar triangles
\frac{\textbf{S}_2}{\textbf{S}_1}=\left ( \frac{MQ}{MP} \right )^2\;\;\Rightarrow\;\frac{MQ}{MP}=\sqrt{\frac{\textbf{S}_2}{\textbf{S}_1}} \tag{2}
We also have \frac{\textbf{S}_{CEFD}}{\textbf{S}_{ABEF}}=\frac{EF \cdot MQ}{EF \cdot MP}=\frac{MQ}{MP}\underset{(2)}{=}\sqrt{\frac{\textbf{S}_2}{\textbf{S}_1}}\;\;\;\Rightarrow \;\textbf{S}_{CEFD}=\textbf{S}_{ABEF} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\textbf{S}_2}{\textbf{S}_1}} \tag{3}
On the other hand \textbf{S}_{ABEF}=AB \cdot MP=2\cdot \textbf{S}_{ABM}=2\cdot\textbf{S}_1\;\;\overset{(3)}{\Rightarrow}\;\textbf{S}_{CEFD}=2\cdot \sqrt{\textbf{S}_1\cdot \textbf{S}_2}
and \textbf{S}_{ABCD}=\textbf{S}_{ABEF}+\textbf{S}_{CEFD}=2\cdot \textbf{S}_1+2\cdot \sqrt{\textbf{S}_1 \cdot \textbf{S}_2}\;\;\;\Leftrightarrow
\Leftrightarrow \textbf{S}_1+\textbf{S}_2+\textbf{S}_3+\textbf{S}_4=2\cdot \textbf{S}_1+2\cdot \sqrt{\textbf{S}_1 \cdot \textbf{S}_2}\;\;\;\Rightarrow \textbf{S}_3+\textbf{S}_4=\textbf{S}_1-\textbf{S}_2+2\cdot \sqrt{\textbf{S}_1 \cdot \textbf{S}_2}
QED \blacksquare
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu